Non è pane, è Gesù. Il corretto modo di fare la comunione

di Padre Paul Cocard

Prefazione di mons. Athanasius Schneider

Ed. Fede & Cultura

La Comunione sulla lingua aiuta a mantenere la distinzione, ereditata dalla Parola di Dio e dalla Chiesa primitiva, tra il sacerdozio comune dei fedeli e il sacerdozio ministeriale. Quest’ultimo deputa il prete al compito dell’Eucaristia che ne ha dunque la custodia e la responsabilità. Durante la Messa, l’Eucaristia, la sua celebrazione e la sua distribuzione gli sono affidate. San Giovanni Paolo II aveva sottolineato che il prete ha le mani consacrate per toccare l’Eucaristia.

In questo campo, la Comunione nella mano traduce di fatto una diminuzione e anche un certo rigetto della Fede cattolica nella Presenza reale. È lontano dall’essere neutro: permette al laico di mettersi allo stesso posto del prete nel suo rapporto all’Eucaristia e di smarcarsi da un forte attestato di Fede nella presenza di Cristo sotto le apparenze del pane e del vino consacrato per non riconoscervi che un segno di comunione tra tutti i membri dell’assemblea o, per lo più, un segno di una presenza puramente spirituale del Cristo.

Twelve Things I Like About the Novus Ordo Mass

Fr. Dwight Longenecker

Like many, I’m critical of the abuses of the new Mass–the dreadful architecture, banal art, saccharine and heterodox music, poor preaching etc etc that too often has gone along with the reforms of the Second Vatican Council, but my point has always been that these are abuses and when you take the Ordinary Form of the Mass–simply what’s in the book–just the words and rubrics–there’s not much wrong with it. Can there be some improvements? Sure, but I’ve asked traditionalists if they can tell me what is so terribly wrong with it–just the words in the book–not all the other abuses and things they don’t like that are associated with Vatican II.

Nobody’s given me a good answer yet.

In keeping with my own view that one should always give the benefit of the doubt and try to find what’s right rather than always find what’s wrong I thought I’d put together this list of what’s GOOD about the Novus Ordo Mass.

(…)

It’s flexible. We’re supposed to honor Latin as the language of our church and it is easy enough to integrate a little or a lot of Latin into the Novus Ordo Mass. It is also flexible musically. You don’t have to use Haagan Daz, hootenany and soft rock music. Learn Gregorian chant and polyphony. It fits.

(…)

It can be celebrated ad orientem, with altar rails, communion administered to the faithful kneeling and on the tongue, well-trained altar servers, good music, vestments, architecture and art. Yes, bland and banal is possible, but so is grand and glorious.

(…)

It’s simple. The plain words and actions of the Novus Ordo provide for a celebration with noble simplicity. Just saying the black and doing the red has a down to earth dignity–not overly ornate and fancy nor banal and vulgar.
Does this mean I am against traditionalists and disapprove of the Extraordinary Form of the Mass? No. It’s good to have both and each should inform the other. A person is most often right in what he affirms and wrong in what he denies. It is possible therefore to be critical of a thing without rejecting it entirely just as it is possible to see the good in a thing without endorsing it 100%.

Read full article here.

Chi impara a credere impara a inginocchiarsi

Chi impara a credere impara a inginocchiarsi, una fede o una liturgia che non conoscano più l’atto di inginocchiarsi, sono ammalate in un punto centrale. Per questo il divieto di inginocchiarsi appare come l’essenza stessa del diabolico. O Gesù, come non inginocchiarsi davanti alla tua umiltà, giunta fino alla morte di croce? E pensare che nella liturgia celeste descritta dall’Apocalisse, l’inginocchiarsi – proskynein – ricorre 24 volte. Per questo il piegare le ginocchia alla tua presenza, di te Dio vivente, è irrinunciabile.

Leggi la lettera completa di Mons. Nicola Bux sul sito di Aldo Maria Valli.

Dom Hugh Somerville Knapman OSB on the new Mass


Mass as envisaged by the new Missal

As argued in an earlier post, some of the changes introduced in practice are not even required by the modern Missal, such as facing the people during the Eucharistic Prayer. Nor is Communion in the Hand. The modern Missal assumes that the priest is facing East, and that Communion is on the tongue. There was of course permission given for the option to face the people, and a limited indult for Communion in the hand. Both have had dire consequences for the worthy celebration of the modern liturgy, and are foreign even to the new Mass. The failure here is in the pastors not in the Church herself.


This is not actually mandated by the new Mass

Some have a clear idea of the remedy for liturgical abuse and poor attendance at Mass. (…) The first step surely is to celebrate the liturgy according to the rubrics laid down by the Church, to do in fact as the Church intends to do.

Read the full post by Dom Hugh Somerville Knapman OSB here.

Intervista a don Federico Bortoli

Un sacerdote, don Federico Bortoli, compie lo studio più approfondito su come si è arrivati a concedere la distribuzione della comunione in mano che Paolo VI e la maggioranza dei vescovi bocciò. Anzitutto con un indulto che doveva essere rivolto solo a quelle diocesi dove si commettevano abusi. Ma poi la “moda” è dilagata. Resta il fatto che la ricezione della comunione in ginocchio e in bocca sia legge universale della Chiesa, la forma consuetudinaria attuale sia solo frutto di una concessione.

Intervista completa di Luisella Scrosati a don Federico Bortoli qui.

Bishop Strickland: Receive Communion on the Tongue while Kneeling

Bishop Strickland’s tweet on Saturday, December 15:

Ways to receive Our Lord as King of the Universe… read and reflect on the Sunday Scriptures, plan your whole weekend around receiving your King, wear your best garments, spend time in quiet, kneel to receive Him, receive Him on the tongue, offer silent time of thanks after mass.

(Reported by Brian Williams here)

What Vatican II said—and didn’t say—about the liturgy

December 4, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – Today is the 55th anniversary of the promulgation of the Second Vatican Council’s Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy, Sacrosanctum Concilium, which took place on December 4, 1963. It is a cause for amazement just how much nonsense people have attributed to it, how much harm they have justified by airy appeals to its supposed requirements.

The Council never said that Mass should cease to be in Latin and should only be in the vernacular. The Constitution reaffirmed that the fixed parts of the Mass would continue to be in Latin, the very language of the Roman Rite, but gave permission to vernacularize some parts, such as the readings and the general intercessions (§36; cf. §101). After stating that the people’s language may be used for some parts, the Council added: “Steps should be taken so that the faithful may also be able to say or to sing together in Latin those parts of the Ordinary of the Mass which pertain to them” (§54). Latin remains, to this day, the official language of the Roman Catholic Church and of her liturgy. It is surprising, to say the least, that the aforementioned desiderata of Vatican II are only rarely achieved.

The Council never said that Gregorian chant should be set aside in favor of new songs. On the contrary, the Council acknowledged Gregorian chant as “specially suited to the Roman liturgy” and deserving “foremost place” (principem locum) in the celebration of Mass, along with the great musical compositions of our heritage (§114–§117). New songs could be added as long as they suited the liturgy—which most of the new songs after the Council didn’t and still don’t.

The Council breathed not a word about the priest “facing the people” over a table. The Council assumed that Mass would continue to be offered at an altar by a priest facing eastwards, so that priest and people were together aligned towards the East, symbol of the Christ who is to come—the universal custom of all liturgical rites, Eastern and Western, from the beginning. In fact, the rubrics of the Missal promulgated by Pope Paul VI presuppose that the priest is facing eastwards.

The Council never dictated that tabernacles be moved from the center of the church, that sanctuaries be “reordered,” or that altar rails be removed. It said nothing about receiving communion in the hand while standing. It assumed that communion under both species would continue to be of rare occurrence among the non-ordained (cf. §55); extraordinary ministers of holy communion are nowhere mentioned. Lastly, the Council did not downplay or discourage traditional practices of piety such as Eucharistic adoration and Marian devotions.

Read full article by Dr. Peter Kwasniewski here.

50 Years of Effete and Infertile Liturgical Culture Is Enough

By Anthony Esolen

Last Sunday I was away from home. It means I must hear Mass somewhere else. (…)

The Second Vatican Council’s document on the liturgy, Sacrosanctum Concilium, says that Latin is the language of the Church; there was no Latin. It says that the pipe organ is best fitted for worship for its grandeur; there was no music on the organ, there was a woman playing the piano, in that style befitting a hotel lounge or a posh funeral parlor—all tinklety-tinkly ninths and elevenths and swoons. Sacrosanctum Concilium says that the people in charge of the music should avail themselves of the vast treasury of Christian hymns; there was one true hymn while the other three were show tunes—slovenly, effeminate, unfit for the liturgy, and impossible to sing for a congregation of both sexes. (…)

Sacrosanctum Concilium says that silence should be respected, but there was no silence. How could there be? We are to be silent before the holy, but at Saint Secular of Southern California there was no sense of the holy.

Read the whole article here.

St John Cantius Parish – Chicago

From its website:

St. John Cantius is a unique church in the Archdiocese of Chicago — helping many discover a profound sense of the Sacred through solemn liturgies and devotions, treasures of sacred art, and liturgical music.
The historic landmark church is one of the best examples of sacred architecture in the city. Located in the heart of Chicago, it is accessible by car, bus, or subway.

The parishioners of St. John Cantius love the Latin Liturgy. They see in the Sacred Rites of the Church an intrinsic beauty that has a transformative power over the soul. The Bride of Christ, the Catholic Church, understands the sacramental nature of her own liturgy, and so our Holy Mother the Church understands that beauty in liturgical gestures and monuments can reflect the beauty of God and direct the faithful towards God. This is why Catholic liturgy is enriched by an atmosphere rich with “smells and bells.” This is why the founding parishioners of St. John Cantius made great sacrifices to build a majestic parish church, replete with sacred art, meant to last for generations to come.
The Roman Liturgy enjoys, in particular, a long and glorious tradition of sacred music, which Vatican II calls “a treasure of inestimable value, greater even than any other art.” Catholics, therefore, are called, not just to sing at Mass, but to sing the Mass. At St. John Cantius a deep appreciation of sacred music is fostered. Sacred chant and polyphony, along with sacred organ music are a regular part of the liturgies of St. John Cantius Parish.
But just as the planets rotate about the sun, the hours of the Divine Office revolve around the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, sanctifying every hour of the day and night. And so the faithful are called to join the members of the Canons Regular of St. John Cantius in singing daily the official prayer of the Church, the Divine Office. The Divine Office unceasingly chants the Davidic Psalter and joins the ceaseless singing of the choirs of angels.
In addition to the Mass and Office, the traditional customs, novenas, and devotions that accompany the seasons of the liturgical year, enhance the liturgical life of the parishioners of St. John Cantius Church. This devotional life fosters a deep love of the Real Presence of Jesus Christ in the Holy Eucharist, as well as devotion to the saints, who are the friends of God.

On Sundays, the 11:00 AM holy Mass is celebrated in the Ordinary Form (Novus Ordo) in Latin and broadcast live on “St. John Cantius Church” YouTube channel.

825 N. Carpenter St.
Chicago, IL 60642
312-243-7373

Reclinatorios de piedra

Artículo por mons. Marco Agostini – L’Osservatore Romano de 20 de agosto 2010:

Es impresionante el cuidado que la arquitectura antigua y moderna reservó, hasta la mitad del siglo XX, a los pisos de las iglesias. No sólo mosaicos y frescos para las paredes, sino pintura en piedra, taraceas, tapetes de mármol también para los pisos.
Me viene a la memoria el variopinto tessellatum de las basílicas de San Zenón o del hipogeo de Santa María en Stelle de Verona, o de aquel extenso y refinado de la basílica de Teodoro en Aquileia, de Santa María en Grado, de San Marcos de Venecia, o del misterioso de la catedral de Otranto. El opus tessulare cosmatesco brillante de oro de las basílicas romanas de Santa María Mayor, San Juan de Letrán, San Clemente, San Lorenzo en Verano, de Santa María en Aracæli, en Cosmedín, en Trastevere, o del complejo episcopal de Tuscania o de la Capilla Sixtina en el Vaticano.
Y además a las taraceas marmóreas de San Esteban Rotondo, San Jorge en Velabro, Santa Constanza, Santa Inés en Roma y de las basílicas de San Marcos en Venecia, del baptisterio de San Juan y de la iglesia de San Miniato en Monte de Florencia, o la incomparable opus sectile de la catedral de Siena, o los escudos marmóreos blancos, negros y rojos en Santa Anastasia en Verona o los pavimentos de la capilla grande del obispo Giberti o de las capillas del siglo XVIII de la Virgen del Pueblo y del Sacramento, siempre en la catedral de Verona, y – sobre todo – el sorprendente y precioso tapete lapídeo de la basílica vaticana de San Pedro.
En verdad el cuidado por los pisos no es sólo de los cristianos: son emocionantes los pavimentos en mosaico de las villas griegas de Olinto o de Pella en Macedonia, o de la imperial villa romana de Casale en Plaza Amerina en Sicilia, o los de las villas de Ostia o de la casa del Fauno en Pompeya o las preciosas escenas del Nilo del santuario de la Fortuna Primigenia en Palestrina. Pero también los pisos en opus sectile de la curia senatorial en el Foro romano, los lacertos provenientes de la basílica de Giunio Basso, también en Roma, o las taraceas marmóreas de la domus de Amor y Psique en Ostia.
El cuidado griego y romano por el pavimento no era evidentemente en los templos, sino en las villas, en las termas y en los otros ambientes públicos donde la familia o la sociedad civil se reunían. También el mosaico de Palestrina no estaba en un ambiente de culto en sentido estricto. La celda del templo pagano era habitada sólo por la estatua del dios y el culto se realizaba en el exterior frente al templo, alrededor del altar del sacrificio. Por tale razones los interiores casi nunca eran decorados.
Por el contrario, el culto cristiano es un culto interior. Instituido en la bella habitación del cenáculo, adornada de tapetes en el piso superior de una casa de amigos, y propagado inicialmente en la intimidad del hogar doméstico, en las domus ecclesiae, cuando el culto cristiano asumió dimensión pública transformó las casas en iglesias. La basílica de San Martín en los Montes surge sobre una domus ecclesiae, y no es la única. Las iglesias no fueron jamás el lugar de un simulacro, sino la casa de Dios entre los hombres, el tabernáculo de la real presencia de Cristo en el santísimo sacramento, la casa común de la familia cristiana. También el más humilde de los cristianos, el más pobre, como miembro del cuerpo de Cristo que es la Iglesia, en la iglesia estaba en casa y era señor: pisaba pisos preciosos, gozaba de los mosaicos y de los frescos de las paredes, de las pinturas sobre los altares, olía el perfume del incienso, sentía la alegría de la música y del canto, veía el esplendor de los ornamentos usados para gloria de Dios, gustaba el don inefable de la eucaristía que le venía dada en cálices de oro, se movía procesionalmente sintiéndose parte del orden que es alma del mundo.
Los pavimentos de las iglesias, lejos de ser ostentaciones de lujo, aparte de constituir el suelo que se pisa, tenían también otras funciones. Seguramente no estaban hechos para ser cubiertos de bancas, introducidas estas últimas en edad relativamente reciente cuando se pensó disponer las naves de las iglesias para la escucha cómoda de largos sermones. Los pavimentos de las iglesias debían ser bien visibles: conservan en la figuración, en los entretejidos geométricos, en la simbología de los colores la mistagogía cristiana, las direcciones procesionales de la liturgia. Son un monumento al fundamento, a las raíces.
Estos pavimentos son principalmente para aquellos que la liturgia la viven y en ella se mueven, son para aquellos que se arrodillan frente a la epifanía de Cristo. El arrodillarse es la respuesta a la epifanía donada por gracia a una persona única. El que está impactado por el resplandor de la visión se postra a tierra y desde allí ve más que todos aquellos que alrededor suyo se han quedado de pie. Estos, adorando o reconociéndose pecadores, ven reflejos en las piedras preciosas, en los entretejidos de oro de las que a veces se componen los pavimentos antiguos, la luz del misterio que refulge del altar y la grandeza de la misericordia divinas.
Pensar que aquellos pavimentos tan bellos están hechos para las rodillas de los fieles es algo conmovedor: un tapete de piedra perenne para la oración cristiana, para la humildad; un tapete para ricos y pobres indistintamente, un tapete para fariseos y publicanos, pero que sobre todo estos últimos saben apreciar.
Hoy los reclinatorios han desaparecido de muchas iglesias y se tiende a remover las balaustradas a las que uno se podía acercar a la comunión de rodillas. Sin embargo en el Nuevo Testamento el gesto de arrodillarse se presenta cada vez que a un hombre se le presenta la divinidad de Cristo: se piense por ejemplo en los Magos, el ciego de nacimiento, la unción de Betania, la Magdalena en el jardín la mañana de Pascua.
Jesús mismo dijo a Satanás, que le quería imponer una genuflexión equivocada, que sólo a Dios se debe doblar la rodilla. Satanás pide todavía hoy que se escoja entre Dios o el poder, Dios o la riqueza, y trata todavía más profundamente. Pero así no se dará gloria a Dios de ninguna manera; las rodillas se doblarán para aquellos que el poder les ha favorecido, para aquellos a los cuales se tiene el corazón unido a través de un acto.
Volver a arrodillarse en la misa es un buen ejercicio de entrenamiento para vencer la idolatría en la vida, además de ser uno de los modos de actuosa participatio de los que habla el último Concilio. La práctica es útil también para darse cuenta de la belleza de los pavimentos (al menos de los antiguos) de nuestras iglesias. Frente a algunos da ganas de quitarse los zapatos como hizo Moisés frente a Dios que le hablaba desde la zarza ardiente.

Fuente: aquí.